Thinking about what may create a sufficient impetus that would actually result in addressing injustices (such as one involving Grenalow Wilson) and the answer is clear: increasing accountability for politicians.
Regarding Grenalow:
So question 1: who is responsible for amending this decision?
I have no idea. Could someone please research this?
Question2: How can credible accountability be created?
Here I think I might have something to say on the subject. I can create a social networking site that would be based around creating a credibility value for different individuals and would enable people to act.
Step 1: Credibility:
Let's say every individual in the system has a credibility between 0 and 100.
1) Each individual starts with credibility of 0
2) Each individual can endorse other individuals
3) The credibility of each individuals is a function of the credibility of those around him/her
4) If an individual is found to have been falsified, this significantly degrades credibility of all members who endorsed this individual.
Step 2: Action
The next step is let people express their positions on different subjects with a clear path to action in case the demand is not met (voting a person out of office, etc.) So we create a site where we all sign a petition with every signature being more than just a name (credibility). Then this petition is presented to people at different levels and the members of the petition are notified of the outcome. Depending on the outcome the populace takes different actions.
What this might be able to attain is creation of responsibility and a sort of dynamic voting that would enable people to express their ideas in a way that would have a significant impact.
This is actually a subset of another application that I have in mind, but I feel it might be easy to implement and directly applicable to situations such as one with Grenalow. It would also significantly improve the political process.
Please let me know what you think.



